Loan system revamp
With the recent "problems" that has been facing banks in EVE, it’s apparent that while the general theory is very sound, the implementation has been severely lacking. The major issue arises when discussing things like regulation and oversight. At EBANK, I believe that the biggest problem was accounting and tracking loan details due to the not very tight connection between the bank database and New Eden.
How do we fix this? Here’s what I suggest:
The loan contract needs to be fixed. How? Use the model that the banks of New Eden uses.
Creation of a loan
The contract is created like all other contracts, from the contract window. The contractor(The person lending money) will be the one creating the contract towards the customer. The contract has to be private as well.
- Here’s the variable that needs to be set:
- Balance – The total ISK value of the loan
- Interest rate – Interest rate ought to be specified in % per month
- Line of credit – Boolean value. Line of credit means that the loan can be repaid in part and the ISK then relent, like a credit-card.
Collateral
The pre-agreed collateral is put into the contract by the contractor. Note: There’s an issue to be had with BPCs vs. BPOs in this sort of contract. There must be made explicit checks to make sure that they aren’t interchangeable.
Collateral modifier: In order to make sure that the collateral doesn’t have to be at a very specific station, the contractor ought to be able to specify if the collateral is allowed to be in non-secure space. Maybe split it into "Allow 0.0" and "Allow low-security space" for increased granularity.
Loan lifetime management
Once the loan has been created, the loan form is sent to the customer. If the person has the collateral as specified in his hangar, then he can accept the loan. The collateral is then made unavailable for all parties
When the loan is accepted, he person effectively has a new wallet, which he can withdraw either 1. The full amount once(Line of credit = false) or 2. A specific amount to his liking (Line of credit = true)
The contractor ought to be able to release specific items in the collateral at any time, to reflect any down-payments on the loan. So say that BOB took out a 30 billion loan on 2 mothership blueprints and has made a 15 billion down payment already, the contractor should be able to release one of the mothership blueprints. Of course, this is optional, but should be an option nonetheless.
Completion of loan
When the very last payment has been made, if the loan is a not a line of credit, the contract will be marked as Completed and all outstanding collateral is returned to the customer.
If it’s a line of credit, the customer will have to mark the contract as Completed, returning the collateral and closing the line of credit.
Loan API
In order to allow for proper accounting, the data needs to be exposed for consumption of outside tools made by the community or the individual organizations.
The loans needs to be exposed through the API with
- Contractor
- Customer name
- Current balance
- Total balance
- Total interest accumulated
After that, you need to be able to query following information:
- Collateral listing
- Withdrawal/Payment history
Due to the nature of the data, a 12-hour caching is quite acceptable in order to decrease load.
Overall, these few things allows for most scenarios of information that would be needed for tracking of an in-game mechanic. Granted the tools that have been developed by the current generation of banks are slightly more advanced, they contain variables that will be hard to encapsulate and will increase complexity and break immersion.
Conclusion
This is a very simple implementation of a loan system. Is it powerful? Hell yes! It encapsulates an agreement between 2 persons and gives freedom. It’s not fool-proof, but the nature of the very explicit agreement means that it’s a lot less likely to be used for griefing, because of the fact that it’s very close to that of real-life.
Tags: Feature
This entry was posted on Friday, September 4th, 2009 at 5:30 pm and is filed under EVE Online. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
September 4th, 2009 at 5:42 pm
“Allow 0.0″ and “Allow lowsec” won’t prevent folks from putting the collateral in some highsec island.
September 4th, 2009 at 5:47 pm
Very fair point.
But that is a feature as far as I’m aware.
September 4th, 2009 at 7:48 pm
I posted this on face book but I figure it deserves restating:
(Seems like more theorizing from one of the culpable parties who benefited. Less culpable than others but eBank sure paved your way to fame. Ironic that you are now using their failure (while you were involved) to make hay and offer more useful suggestions.)
In the end, it is not that you have nothing useful to add. It simply boils down to this: why do you think you can comment so freely on others when you’ve failed, totally, to explore and detail your own involvement and culpability in the current wave of failures?
September 4th, 2009 at 8:02 pm
What’s up with the ad hominem?
Your argument relies on the idea that I shouldn’t be allowed to suggest that CCP implements a feature that helps banks(Just as it helps everybody who wants to loan ISK to a friend), because I was involved with EBANK?
September 5th, 2009 at 3:49 am
I find this to be a great idea.
Currently the loan system is horrid in the way that it is confusing and only the person who wants to get money can setup the contract.
Good way to suggest a rework.
September 5th, 2009 at 6:02 am
This doesn’t cover defaults, though. How does anyone determine whether the loan defaults, and how does the lender take possession of the collateral if that happens?
September 8th, 2009 at 4:43 pm
@Shar Tegral: Eve Bank’s issues came about from a team “effort” so to speak. And quite frankly, have no bearing on the quality or lack thereof of this post’s subject.
@Lavista: I like the loan idea with collateral to back it up.
November 28th, 2009 at 11:42 am
The only problem in this post is that there’s no forced return of the loan or forced collateral claim.
The problem with EBANK was that loans didn’t get paid, if you were to implement a loan system it should be default-able and be like real life loans with a monthly payment, and also an option to say after how many months of not paying the collateral gets claimed by the loan supplier.